If we are to abide by Martin's eminently suggestion of permitting the
new pure odd dataRef to coexist with the current <dataype> mechanism, I
can't see any way out of doing the following
a) make a set of new <dataSpec> elements corresponding with the existing
<macroSpec type="dt">s
b) since @ident values are supposed to be unique, these new things will
all have to have different names (I suggest teidata.foo rather than
data.foo)
c) the current section 1.4.2 on datatype macros (#DTYPES, in #ST) will
also need to be cloned, or substantially revised, since this is where
the pesky things are actually defined
Anyone got any better ideas?