I just reviewed our emails on the topic, and have this (not very
helpful) summary of positions taken to date:
Elli says “Either print or bookish… print” today (though previously
concerned that Print was misleading)
Magda says “I prefer “Go, or Stick to Simple, or Print, but not Bookish”
Elisa says “I abhor Simple… better off with Print or Bookish”
James says “I would have voted Simple; definitely against bookish”
Syd says “I dislike Simple; OK with Bookish or Go” [and various other
suggestions]
Hugh says “I voted reluctantly for Print” could do Bookish; definitely
not Simple
Raff likes Bookish; no big issue with Print; Simple may be misleading
Peter suggest “go” and other things
Kevin likes Bookish;
Martina “dislikes Print; no problem with keeping it Simple”; Bookish is
not too bad.
So another way of approaching this (since democratic elections dont seem
to work) might be to look at this little table
DISLIKE TOLERABLE SUPPORTED
Bookish JC,MT HC,SB,EM,EB KT,RV
Go SB PS,MT
Print MS,JC RV,HC,EB EM
Simple RV,HC, SB,EB MT MS, JC
I leave it to you to correct this table. And indeed decide how to
interpret it. Does the fact that Bookish (for example) has just as many
people strongly disliking it as wish to promote it suggest that it is
too divisive to be adopted?
Bear in mind that we want to find the least worst solution here, which
will upset/confuse the smallest number of people...
