In Prague we agreed that odd4odds should be put into Exemplars/ and
thus the oXygen framework, and that I should have that ready by the
conference (on which I'm giving a talk on it).
IIRC we decided to call it "tei_customization.odd" (and thus .rng,
.rnc, etc.).
I was recently reminding Martin of this schema and the differences
between it and tei_odds, and he wondered aloud if we shouldn't think
of tei_customization as a schema to use when creating a TEI
customization that is a profile of, or subset of, or constraint of
the TEI. (I.e., the set of documents that conform to the customized
TEI is a proper subset of the set of documents that conform to
tei_all.) And that we think of tei_odds as a schema to use when
creating a TEI customization that is an extension of the TEI.
That might mean renaming them to tei_customization_extension and
tei_subset_customization or some such. Thoughts? (Remember that the
present problem we are worrying about is how to explain to the oXygen
user the difference between the two. If I understand correctly, we
only get to present the user with the name of the thing, no pop-up or
mouse-over gloss available. However, we do get to put comments in the
template. :-)
