I think that, as a general principle, adding a value for @source to indicate the Guidelines release against which any ODD was defined, IS A VERY GOOD IDEA. On 05/10/18 11:48, Peter Stadler wrote:
If we added source="tei:3.4.0“ to the Enrich ODD schemaSpec we’d fix the current build, I believe. I know it’s sort of a hack, but on the other hand we document the „freeze“ of this customisation and keep it stable.
What do you think? Peter
PS: We’d still need to investigate Syd’s a)
Am 05.10.2018 um 05:57 schrieb Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu>:
The dev branch now has all the deprecations valid until 2018-10-01 removed, and its build working ala Travis. However, said build is not working in Jenkins (on either jenkins or jenkins2 -- for some reason the former does not have parsed console output, but it is the same error), and is working on my local system, after a fashion.
The error on Jenkins, however, is completely mysterious. It has *nothing* to do with anything that I am aware of having changed. The ONVDL validation of Exemplars/tei_enrich.odd against Exemplars/tei_enrich.nvdl is failing with error: bad value for attribute "columns" where the value for @columns is "1", and thus is perfectly fine.
I can, with some effort, reproduce this error on my local system. All of the @columns attrs in tei_enrich.odd are on elements in the teix: namespace, i.e. within <egXML>. I am pretty sure the only schema tei_enrich.nvdl runs against that namespace is tei_enrich-examples.rng. And lo and behold, when I look at that schema the definition of @columns of <layout> is obviously screwball: | <attribute name="columns"> | <a:documentation xmlns:a="http://relaxng.org/ns/compatibility/annotations/1.0">specifies | the number of columns per page</a:documentation> | <list> | <rng:empty xmlns:rng="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"/> | </list> | </attribute>
I poked around and found that the tei_enrich.odd file changes the definition of <layout> a teeny bit: | <elementSpec ident="layout" mode="change" module="msdescription"> | <attList> | <attDef ident="columns" mode="change" usage="req"/> | </attList> | </elementSpec> But that specification is in a paragraph of prose that essentially negates it: | <p>Note that if (as in the last example above) no value is given for | the <att>columns</att> attribute, the assumption is that there is a | single column of writing on each page. (And is incorrect, in that the prior example does have a value for layout/@columns.)
So I claim that a) This is a Stylesheets issue. Somehow changing @columns to required has nuked its datatype, which is supposed to be ( data.count, data.count? ) b) The Enrich ODD has other problems, too
I'm too tired now to do much more on this tonight. _______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council