I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear winner or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice. Sent from my phone.

On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman wrote:

Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. But really, would be fine with Durham, too.

...

Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's just choose a date and place" poll at http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward Durham at the end of April.

I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a vote wasted. Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: Stefan Majewski Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of the infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as well. In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will be okay. Cheers, Stefan Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" :

I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear winner or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice.

Sent from my phone.

...

On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman wrote:

Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. But really, would be fine with Durham, too.

...

Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's just choose a date and place" poll at http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward Durham at the end of April.

I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you? On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti wrote:

I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.

f

2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard :

...

exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a vote wasted.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message -------- From: Stefan Majewski Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting

But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of the infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as well. In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will be okay.

Cheers, Stefan Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" :

...

I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear winner or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice.

Sent from my phone.

...

On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman wrote:

Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. But really, would be fine with Durham, too.

...

Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's just choose a date and place" poll at http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward Durham at the end of April.

I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

I think the poll indicates, fwiw, two possible dates for Ann Arbor, both of which might be described as "end of May", i.e. 27-29 May, and 28-30 May. Could we perhaps make a decision now? I have a preference for 28-30 may, fwiw, but can live with either. I can even live with the rival suggestion of Durham for 30-may2 if need be. The thing I cannot endure much longer is this protracted uncertainty .... On 16/02/15 13:09, Paul Schaffner wrote:

As I suggested in a previous message, perhaps obscurely, I think that a date at the end of April or beginning of May would be next to impossible because it would coincide with the University graduation week/end, making it verra difficult to find a hotel room, much less ten or so. So if held here, it would have to be the later date (end of May, that is), simply as a logistical question.

pfs

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015, at 10:06, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti wrote:

...

I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.

f

2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard :

...

exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a vote wasted.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message -------- From: Stefan Majewski Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting

But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of the infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as well. In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will be okay.

Cheers, Stefan Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" :

...

I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear winner or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice.

Sent from my phone.

...

On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman wrote: Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. But really, would be fine with Durham, too.

> Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's > just choose a date and place" poll at > http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all > about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward > Durham at the end of April. > > I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

+1 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Hugh Cayless wrote:

The preponderance of votes was for 28-30 I think, and even for the earlier meeting in Durham, most people seemed to want a Thursday–Saturday meeting, so unless Paul has any reasons why that wouldn't work, let's say Ann Arbor, May 28-30.

Any objections?

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

...

I think the poll indicates, fwiw, two possible dates for Ann Arbor, both of which might be described as "end of May", i.e. 27-29 May, and 28-30 May.

Could we perhaps make a decision now? I have a preference for 28-30 may, fwiw, but can live with either. I can even live with the rival suggestion of Durham for 30-may2 if need be. The thing I cannot endure much longer is this protracted uncertainty ....

On 16/02/15 13:09, Paul Schaffner wrote:

...

As I suggested in a previous message, perhaps obscurely, I think that a date at the end of April or beginning of May would be next to impossible because it would coincide with the University graduation week/end, making it verra difficult to find a hotel room, much less ten or so. So if held here, it would have to be the later date (end of May, that is), simply as a logistical question.

pfs

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015, at 10:06, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti < fabio.ciotti@uniroma2.it> wrote:

I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting

...

in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.

f

2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard

...

exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a

vote wasted.

...

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message -------- From: Stefan Majewski Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting

But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of the infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as

well.

...

In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will

be

...

okay.

Cheers, Stefan Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" :

I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear > winner

...

or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice. > > Sent from my phone. > > On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman >> > wrote:

...

Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how >> it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a >> mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. >> But really, would be fine with Durham, too. >> >> Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's >>> just choose a date and place" poll at >>> http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all >>> about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward >>> Durham at the end of April. >>> >>> I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. >>> >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> > -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > > -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

I don't think that's an insurmountable problem... :-) On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Paul Schaffner wrote:

The only problem I can think of with Saturday is that the library doors don't open till 10 am (M-F it's 8). So if we were meeting in the library, we'd have to start later on Saturday. Which might not be a terrible thing. pfs

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 11:41, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

The preponderance of votes was for 28-30 I think, and even for the earlier meeting in Durham, most people seemed to want a Thursday–Saturday meeting, so unless Paul has any reasons why that wouldn't work, let's say Ann Arbor, May 28-30.

Any objections?

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...

I think the poll indicates, fwiw, two possible dates for Ann Arbor, both of which might be described as "end of May", i.e. 27-29 May, and 28-30 May.

Could we perhaps make a decision now? I have a preference for 28-30 may, fwiw, but can live with either. I can even live with the rival suggestion of Durham for 30-may2 if need be. The thing I cannot endure much longer is this protracted uncertainty ....

On 16/02/15 13:09, Paul Schaffner wrote:

...

As I suggested in a previous message, perhaps obscurely, I think that a date at the end of April or beginning of May would be next to impossible because it would coincide with the University graduation week/end, making it verra difficult to find a hotel room, much less ten or so. So if held here, it would have to be the later date (end of May, that is), simply as a logistical question.

pfs

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015, at 10:06, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti < fabio.ciotti@uniroma2.it> wrote:

I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting

...

in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.

f

2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk>:

> exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a > vote wasted.

> > Sent from Samsung Mobile > > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Stefan Majewski > Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) > To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting > > > But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of > the > infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as > well.

> In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will > be

> okay. > > Cheers, > Stefan > Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless" > I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear >> > winner

> or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice. >> >> Sent from my phone. >> >> On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman

...

...

...

...

>>> >> wrote:

> Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how >>> it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a >>> mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. >>> But really, would be fine with Durham, too. >>> >>> Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's >>>> just choose a date and place" poll at >>>> http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all >>>> about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward >>>> Durham at the end of April. >>>> >>>> I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. >>>> >>> -- >>> tei-council mailing list >>> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >>> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >>> >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> >> -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- Paul Schaffner Digital Library Production Service PFSchaffner@umich.edu | http://www.umich.edu/~pfs/

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Ok for me, so on 28th I can offer you a drink for my birthday! Fabio 2015-02-16 18:10 GMT+01:00 Syd Bauman :

I've put Thu 28 to Sat 30 May 2015 in Ann Arbor down on my calendar, and told Julia we'll be seriously considering Northeastern for Spring 2016. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived