Hi James, thanks for the explanation – I figured there was some human intervention which is now fixed. Resistance is futil ;) Cheers Peter

Am 05.12.2019 um 13:42 schrieb James Cummings :

No objections to that. For the record some of these may have been instances where we had done a full release, realised that there was some corrigible error (in the build/release process), and then manually or otherwise did a re-release without changing the actual date of release. That is, we did the release, announced it, noticed an important error (like the non-English pages having not generated properly) and then silently fixed it without mentioning it publicly. ;-) There were also instances where stumbling blocks in the release meant that it went over midnight in the timezone where the build was happening. Not saying we shouldn't update the webpages to match the XML reality, just explaining.

(Now off strike, but working to contract.) Many thanks, James

-- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@newcastle.ac.uk Senior Lecturer in Late-Medieval Literature and Digital Humanities School of English, Newcastle University From: Tei-council on behalf of Peter Stadler Sent: 29 November 2019 06:39 To: TEI Council Subject: [Tei-council] release dates, some findings

for the record: While working through the Guidelines releases for the Zenodo ingest I discovered and fixed some inconsistencies regarding release dates at [1]. A few dates differed from what is mentioned in the respective release notes, so I fixed it to match the release notes. Lastly, one release note has the wrong date [2] which I already fixed in the xml [3]. I propose to adjust the date in the html version in the vault, as well, which I’ll do as soon as I get access to the vault.

Best Peter

[1] https://tei-c.org/guidelines/P5/ (table: „Version Date of Release (& Release Notes)“) [2] https://tei-c.org/Vault/P5/current/doc/tei-p5-doc/readme-3.2.0.html [3] https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/9150346745c0057d74a20d0a36bcbbb09260d865