At a first sight seems reasonable. As for including or not att.damaged and deprecating @hand in <gap> <unclear> I would agree with you since 1) imho @hand implies (or should) an intentional act of writing that results in a material and perceptible set (or continuum) of signs 2) there is @resp (now global) to assert the attribution of personal agency to any material phenomena on a source But I don't know how wide would be the damage to retrocompatibility f 2015-02-26 10:19 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk>:

Could someone please comment on my proposed actions concerning this longstanding FR?

https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/480/

It's the one about classifying the use of @hand better...

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived