Attn: James C., Magdelena T., and others intimately familiar with the Processing Model I have merged in changes from 'dev' branch into 'sydb-modelAttrChecks' branch. The only changes are in P5/Source/Specs/model.xml; the only significant change there is the addition of two new <constraintSpec>s. Could you test the Schematron? If you don't want to build it yourself you can find it here: http://paramedic.wwp.neu.edu/~syd/temp/TEI_Council/testPMtests/tei_all.isosc... http://paramedic.wwp.neu.edu/~syd/temp/TEI_Council/testPMtests/ref-model.htm... Thanks. BTW, I know that the tagdoc looks ugly because of long lines. I'm really interested in whether a) the Schematron is complaining about the right stuff, and b) if the error messages are understandable.
Has anybody tested this yet? It's been two weeks, so I hope so. If not, it shouldn't take much. Just download the Schematron file [1] and validate an ODD that has some <model> elements that are problemetic against it. Would be lovely to close this ticket (#1496). [1] http://paramedic.wwp.neu.edu/~syd/temp/TEI_Council/testPMtests/tei_all.isosc...
Attn: James C., Magdelena T., and others intimately familiar with the Processing Model
I have merged in changes from 'dev' branch into 'sydb-modelAttrChecks' branch. The only changes are in P5/Source/Specs/model.xml; the only significant change there is the addition of two new <constraintSpec>s. Could you test the Schematron? If you don't want to build it yourself you can find it here: http://paramedic.wwp.neu.edu/~syd/temp/TEI_Council/testPMtests/tei_all.isosc... http://paramedic.wwp.neu.edu/~syd/temp/TEI_Council/testPMtests/ref-model.htm...
Thanks.
BTW, I know that the tagdoc looks ugly because of long lines. I'm really interested in whether a) the Schematron is complaining about the right stuff, and b) if the error messages are understandable.
participants (1)
-
Syd Bauman