Ah consensus is a rare and truly wonderful thing. Thanks guys. As a reward I hope to check in a first version of my latest masterpiece "odd chaining for idiots" later tonight... Sent from my Honor Mobile -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [tei-council] another name issue From: Raffaele Viglianti To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org CC: Idem. On Oct 22, 2016 2:40 PM, "Hugh Cayless" wrote:

I think of it as a compiled ODD too.

Sent from my phone.

...

On Oct 22, 2016, at 13:31, James Cummings wrote:

I've always said compiled ODD.

Resolved also makes sense.

James

-- Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford

On 22 Oct 2016 18:29, Lou Burnard wrote: Talking of naming, can we get a consensus on what we call the thing that results from processing a TEI ODD with teitoodd ? It's analogous to the p5subset.xml we know and love, so maybe we should call it a subset, not an ODD (which is what teitoodd implies : give it foo.odd and you will receive foo.odd.odd) . It isn't an ODD as we know it, obviously. But it isn't necessarily a subset either. I think of it as a "compiled ODD" but maybe that has the wrong connotations. Its distinguishing feature is that any *Ref elements such as elementRef classRef etc. in the input will have been resolved so maybe its a "resolved ODD" or an "explicit ODD" ...

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived