Re: [tei-council] CHANGED: RomaJS meeting Wednesday at 15:00 UTC
The teiconsortium@gmail.com user could share its calendar with the google accounts of all Board and Council giving us all write access to it. (Individuals could choose to receive notifications from it or not.) So I'm confused about when the RomaJS meeting is now happening? Best wishes, James -- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@newcastle.ac.uk School of English Literature, Language, and Linguistics, Newcastle University ________________________________ From: tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org <tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org> on behalf of Elisa Beshero-Bondar <ebbondar@gmail.com> Sent: 15 January 2018 15:40:14 To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] CHANGED: RomaJS meeting Wednesday at 15:00 UTC Apologies that I won’t be able to make the Wednesday meeting, but I definitely like the idea of a shared calendar—a Google Calendar would make scheduling for us much easier, since you can input times in your own time zone and translate them into UTC and other time zones. Elisa -- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu> Development site: http://newtfire.org <http://newtfire.org/>
On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Raffaele Viglianti <raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com> wrote:
Ugh sorry, obviously I confused time zones. We're meeting tomorrow for the stylesheets at 2pm UTC, but I read it as 2pm EST. We really need a shared calendar, maybe this is something to talk about at the F2F.
Elisa, I don't like very much the idea of following the stylesheets meeting with another meeting. Personally, that would take too much time from my work day's schedule. Likewise, I'd rather not have both meetings on the same day, regardless of time conflict.
So let's keep the changed time as indicated in this email's subject: Wednesday January 17th at 15:00 UTC / 10:00 EST.
Raff
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Elisa Beshero-Bondar <ebbondar@gmail.com <mailto:ebbondar@gmail.com>> wrote:
I was about to write the same thing—Raff, I wonder if more of us might be able to attend if you held your meeting tomorrow immediately to follow the Stylesheets meeting?
Elisa -- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu> <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu>> Development site: http://newtfire.org <http://newtfire.org/> <http://newtfire.org/ <http://newtfire.org/>>
On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu> wrote:
This must be some new definition of "conflict" of which I was formerly unaware. The Stylesheets meeting is at 09:00 EDT, so neither your original 15:00 suggestion nor the 10:00 is theorhetically in conflict.
Never mind, just realized this conflicts with the Stylesheets meeting. Sorry!
The second best meeting from the poll is this Wednesday Jan 17 at 10:00 EDT / 15:00 UTC, so let's go with that.
Sorry again for the confusion! -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org <mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council <http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council>
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org <mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council <http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council>
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
The meeting will happen as indicated in this email's subject: Wednesday 17th at 15:00 UTC On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:27 PM, James Cummings < James.Cummings@newcastle.ac.uk> wrote:
The teiconsortium@gmail.com user could share its calendar with the google accounts of all Board and Council giving us all write access to it. (Individuals could choose to receive notifications from it or not.)
So I'm confused about when the RomaJS meeting is now happening?
Best wishes,
James
--
Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@newcastle.ac.uk
School of English Literature, Language, and Linguistics, Newcastle University
________________________________ From: tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org <tei-council-bounces@lists. tei-c.org> on behalf of Elisa Beshero-Bondar <ebbondar@gmail.com> Sent: 15 January 2018 15:40:14 To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] CHANGED: RomaJS meeting Wednesday at 15:00 UTC
Apologies that I won’t be able to make the Wednesday meeting, but I definitely like the idea of a shared calendar—a Google Calendar would make scheduling for us much easier, since you can input times in your own time zone and translate them into UTC and other time zones.
Elisa -- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu> Development site: http://newtfire.org <http://newtfire.org/>
On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Raffaele Viglianti < raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com> wrote:
Ugh sorry, obviously I confused time zones. We're meeting tomorrow for the stylesheets at 2pm UTC, but I read it as 2pm EST. We really need a shared calendar, maybe this is something to talk about at the F2F.
Elisa, I don't like very much the idea of following the stylesheets meeting with another meeting. Personally, that would take too much time from my work day's schedule. Likewise, I'd rather not have both meetings on the same day, regardless of time conflict.
So let's keep the changed time as indicated in this email's subject: Wednesday January 17th at 15:00 UTC / 10:00 EST.
Raff
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Elisa Beshero-Bondar < ebbondar@gmail.com <mailto:ebbondar@gmail.com>> wrote:
I was about to write the same thing—Raff, I wonder if more of us might be able to attend if you held your meeting tomorrow immediately to follow the Stylesheets meeting?
Elisa -- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu> <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu <mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu>> Development site: http://newtfire.org <http://newtfire.org/> < http://newtfire.org/ <http://newtfire.org/>>
On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu> wrote:
This must be some new definition of "conflict" of which I was formerly unaware. The Stylesheets meeting is at 09:00 EDT, so neither your original 15:00 suggestion nor the 10:00 is theorhetically in conflict.
Never mind, just realized this conflicts with the Stylesheets meeting. Sorry!
The second best meeting from the poll is this Wednesday Jan 17 at 10:00 EDT / 15:00 UTC, so let's go with that.
Sorry again for the confusion! -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org <mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council < http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council>
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org <mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council < http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council>
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
participants (2)
-
James Cummings -
Raffaele Viglianti