co-operative stylesheet education session #12
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself. Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket.
I'm sorry to miss this, but I'll be away. Raff On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu> wrote:
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST
However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself.
Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
If there was time, I’d like to get some input on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets/issues/249 which is something that’s bothering me (but could be of interest to more people I hope). Cheers Peter
Am 30.09.2017 um 04:42 schrieb Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu>:
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST
However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself.
Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
On that ticket, are we looking for a deep dive or a quick fix? Does everyone agree on what should happen? Cheers, Martin On 2017-10-03 06:04 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
If there was time, I’d like to get some input on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets/issues/249 which is something that’s bothering me (but could be of interest to more people I hope).
Cheers Peter
Am 30.09.2017 um 04:42 schrieb Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu>:
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST
However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself.
Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
I have a proposed fix in the branch peterstadler-fix-multiple-schemaSpecs and there are some comments on the ticket now – many thanks! My idea in bringing this to the Stylesheets group was to promote the use of multiple schemaSpecs and to have a closer look at the processing behind it. So, probably more educational then a quick fix … Maybe we should postpone it though because I guess we’ll have to spent the whole time for the discussion of our homework. Cheers Peter
Am 03.10.2017 um 18:10 schrieb Martin Holmes <mholmes@uvic.ca>:
On that ticket, are we looking for a deep dive or a quick fix? Does everyone agree on what should happen?
Cheers, Martin
On 2017-10-03 06:04 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
If there was time, I’d like to get some input on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets/issues/249 which is something that’s bothering me (but could be of interest to more people I hope). Cheers Peter
Am 30.09.2017 um 04:42 schrieb Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu>:
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST
However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself.
Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
I don't see why we shouldn't look at this. I think the homework ticket will eat up as much time as we give it without being finished. :-) On 2017-10-03 02:05 PM, Peter Stadler wrote:
I have a proposed fix in the branch peterstadler-fix-multiple-schemaSpecs and there are some comments on the ticket now – many thanks! My idea in bringing this to the Stylesheets group was to promote the use of multiple schemaSpecs and to have a closer look at the processing behind it. So, probably more educational then a quick fix … Maybe we should postpone it though because I guess we’ll have to spent the whole time for the discussion of our homework.
Cheers Peter
Am 03.10.2017 um 18:10 schrieb Martin Holmes <mholmes@uvic.ca>:
On that ticket, are we looking for a deep dive or a quick fix? Does everyone agree on what should happen?
Cheers, Martin
On 2017-10-03 06:04 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:
If there was time, I’d like to get some input on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets/issues/249 which is something that’s bothering me (but could be of interest to more people I hope). Cheers Peter
Am 30.09.2017 um 04:42 schrieb Syd Bauman <s.bauman@northeastern.edu>:
I believe we are scheduled for this coming Thu 10-05 13:00Z, i.e.: * 06:00 PDT * 09:00 EDT * 14:00 BST * 15:00 CEST
However, there is only a 50% chance I can make that meeting myself.
Our homework from the last session was for each of us to come up with a solution and a test file. But we also realized that having a comprehensive idea of what should be happening is a good idea. So it seems to me & Martin that our first step should be deciding what the proper outcome is for each combination of the various flavors of the various constructs involved (e.g., adding a new attribute to a list that is a closed list). To that end we have started developing a comprehensive test file and table of the possible combinations on the ticket. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
participants (4)
-
Martin Holmes -
Peter Stadler -
Raffaele Viglianti -
Syd Bauman