What's with "TEI pour les cartes postales"? It is an ODD in ./P5/Exemplars/tei_bare_bis.odd which, as far as I can tell, is never built or used in any process, whether bash file, ANT file, or Makefile. It's version history says it has barely been tweaked since it was added to our old Subversion repository 2011-01-23 by Lou with the comment "add useless alt syntax version". It's also quite out of date, and has at least a few errors. (E.g., it is invalid because it is missing a <publisher> or equivalent, and it is erroneous because it does not include <teiHeader>. (The 'teiHeader' inclusion is on the <moduleRef> for the textstructure module, but it is actually in the header module.) If it is useless, unused, broken, and out of date, maybe we can ditch it? Anyone remember why it is there in the first place?
This is Lou's, used in teaching TEI using postcards as samples, I think. The publisher thing rears its head in lots of our old teaching materials since it was required prior. -James On 16/01/17 22:21, Syd Bauman wrote:
What's with "TEI pour les cartes postales"?
It is an ODD in ./P5/Exemplars/tei_bare_bis.odd which, as far as I can tell, is never built or used in any process, whether bash file, ANT file, or Makefile. It's version history says it has barely been tweaked since it was added to our old Subversion repository 2011-01-23 by Lou with the comment "add useless alt syntax version".
It's also quite out of date, and has at least a few errors. (E.g., it is invalid because it is missing a <publisher> or equivalent, and it is erroneous because it does not include <teiHeader>. (The 'teiHeader' inclusion is on the <moduleRef> for the textstructure module, but it is actually in the header module.)
If it is useless, unused, broken, and out of date, maybe we can ditch it? Anyone remember why it is there in the first place?
-- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
participants (2)
-
James Cummings -
Syd Bauman