Dear all, I’ve been spending my time on getting the Pure ODD display working in the GLs generation. I’m getting closer, I think, though there are still some issues. Can you take a look at http://teic.github.io/TEI/index.html http://teic.github.io/TEI/index.html (e.g. http://teic.github.io/TEI/ref-certainty.html http://teic.github.io/TEI/ref-certainty.html) and see if the Pure ODD display is what you were hoping for, and what bugs you can find. Issues I’m aware of are: RelaxNG display is displaying the result of evaluating data types rather than a link to the data type definition and "Used by" isn’t getting populated for macros and dataypes. What I’d really like to know is whether I’m on the right track or a different display is needed. This (unsurprisingly) turns out to be way more complicated than I’d hoped, and I haven’t even begun to work out how to alter the display for GLs output beyond HTML. This could take a while.
On 24/11/15 17:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:
Dear all,
I’ve been spending my time on getting the Pure ODD display working in the GLs generation.
Hoorah!
I’m getting closer, I think, though there are still some issues. Can you take a look at http://teic.github.io/TEI/index.html http://teic.github.io/TEI/index.html (e.g. http://teic.github.io/TEI/ref-certainty.html http://teic.github.io/TEI/ref-certainty.html) and see if the Pure ODD display is what you were hoping for, and what bugs you can find.
1. I am not expecting to see anything except the <content> element inside the "Pure ODD" section. The rest is already available in other parts of the display. I certainly dont want to see the source of the attDefs. 2. Why is att.scoping listed in the <classes> inside the pure ODD section, but not in the "memberOf" section?
Issues I’m aware of are: RelaxNG display is displaying the result of evaluating data types rather than a link to the data type definition and "Used by" isn’t getting populated for macros and dataypes.
Check.
What I’d really like to know is whether I’m on the right track or a different display is needed.
Yes, modulo my comment above.
This (unsurprisingly) turns out to be way more complicated than I’d hoped, and I haven’t even begun to work out how to alter the display for GLs output beyond HTML. This could take a while.
Welcome to the fun house.
On Nov 24, 2015, at 13:44 , Lou Burnard
wrote: 1. I am not expecting to see anything except the <content> element inside the "Pure ODD" section. The rest is already available in other parts of the display. I certainly dont want to see the source of the attDefs.
That’s easy enough. I was under the impression others wanted more…?
2. Why is att.scoping listed in the <classes> inside the pure ODD section, but not in the "memberOf" section?
Absolutely no idea. Should it be excluded? Won’t matter of course if I’m not showing the classes at all.
Issues I’m aware of are: RelaxNG display is displaying the result of evaluating data types rather than a link to the data type definition and "Used by" isn’t getting populated for macros and dataypes.
Check.
What I’d really like to know is whether I’m on the right track or a different display is needed.
Yes, modulo my comment above.
This (unsurprisingly) turns out to be way more complicated than I’d hoped, and I haven’t even begun to work out how to alter the display for GLs output beyond HTML. This could take a while.
Welcome to the fun house.
It’s not all that fun, really.
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
participants (2)
-
Hugh Cayless
-
Lou Burnard