I just reviewed our emails on the topic, and have this (not very helpful) summary of positions taken to date: Elli says “Either print or bookish… print” today (though previously concerned that Print was misleading) Magda says “I prefer “Go, or Stick to Simple, or Print, but not Bookish” Elisa says “I abhor Simple… better off with Print or Bookish” James says “I would have voted Simple; definitely against bookish” Syd says “I dislike Simple; OK with Bookish or Go” [and various other suggestions] Hugh says “I voted reluctantly for Print” could do Bookish; definitely not Simple Raff likes Bookish; no big issue with Print; Simple may be misleading Peter suggest “go” and other things Kevin likes Bookish; Martina “dislikes Print; no problem with keeping it Simple”; Bookish is not too bad. So another way of approaching this (since democratic elections dont seem to work) might be to look at this little table DISLIKE TOLERABLE SUPPORTED Bookish JC,MT HC,SB,EM,EB KT,RV Go SB PS,MT Print MS,JC RV,HC,EB EM Simple RV,HC, SB,EB MT MS, JC I leave it to you to correct this table. And indeed decide how to interpret it. Does the fact that Bookish (for example) has just as many people strongly disliking it as wish to promote it suggest that it is too divisive to be adopted? Bear in mind that we want to find the least worst solution here, which will upset/confuse the smallest number of people...