As a general principle, I think that discussion of issues like this which affect all council members should be open to all council members, even those who prefer to remain silent/ignorant. Council membership should not be subdivided. On 06/04/16 18:56, Magdalena Turska wrote:

Hi Hugh,

I am a curious case of a developer who is at rather pathetic level with all sysadmin stuff (blame it on having sysadmin for a husband since forever). I would not contribute any wisdom to such a workgroup but on the other hand if you can get me to make it work, it could be your ultimate measure if it is indeed easy to set up. I will leave the decision to you and won't be offended if you'll be better off without me ;-)

Magdalena

On 6 April 2016 at 18:25, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

Dear All,

Some of us have been chatting about setting up a working group to get our Jenkins testing protocols properly sorted out and to make it easier to set up new TEI Jenkins environments. Is there anyone who's not in on the current discussion (Martin, James, Peter, Elisa, and Syd) who'd like to join in on such a thing?

Hugh -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

"if you all want to be copied in on all the details, we can easily do that " This sentence demonstrates exactly what makes me feel uneasy. Who is "you all" and who is "we"? I thought we had a single council, not an affiliation of special interest groups. On 06/04/16 19:10, Hugh Cayless wrote:

There's no intention to exclude, it just started out as folks who were involved with the release talking about how to do it better next time. We need Martin too, and I've asked him to chair the WG. Council is not going to be left out of the loop on this, but if you all want to be copied in on all the details, we can easily do that :-).

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...

As a general principle, I think that discussion of issues like this which affect all council members should be open to all council members, even those who prefer to remain silent/ignorant. Council membership should not be subdivided.

On 06/04/16 18:56, Magdalena Turska wrote:

...

Hi Hugh,

I am a curious case of a developer who is at rather pathetic level with all sysadmin stuff (blame it on having sysadmin for a husband since forever). I would not contribute any wisdom to such a workgroup but on the other hand if you can get me to make it work, it could be your ultimate measure if it is indeed easy to set up. I will leave the decision to you and won't be offended if you'll be better off without me ;-)

Magdalena

On 6 April 2016 at 18:25, Hugh Cayless wrote:

Dear All,

...

Some of us have been chatting about setting up a working group to get our Jenkins testing protocols properly sorted out and to make it easier to set up new TEI Jenkins environments. Is there anyone who's not in on the current discussion (Martin, James, Peter, Elisa, and Syd) who'd like to join in on such a thing?

Hugh -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

I can't imagine we wouldn't be better off having you :-). I was forced to learn sysadmin stuff fairly early on and it has served me really well at times. Particularly in dealing with recalcitrant sysadmins. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Magdalena Turska wrote:

Hi Hugh,

I am a curious case of a developer who is at rather pathetic level with all sysadmin stuff (blame it on having sysadmin for a husband since forever). I would not contribute any wisdom to such a workgroup but on the other hand if you can get me to make it work, it could be your ultimate measure if it is indeed easy to set up. I will leave the decision to you and won't be offended if you'll be better off without me ;-)

Magdalena

On 6 April 2016 at 18:25, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

Dear All,

Some of us have been chatting about setting up a working group to get our Jenkins testing protocols properly sorted out and to make it easier to set up new TEI Jenkins environments. Is there anyone who's not in on the current discussion (Martin, James, Peter, Elisa, and Syd) who'd like to join in on such a thing?

Hugh -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived