gittery

older
rules for enforcing abstract model

Lou Burnard

28 Sep 2015 28 Sep '15

5:51 p.m.

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me. Che?

Show replies by date

Hugh Cayless

28 Sep 28 Sep

6:07 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master"

There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...

I say "git pull"

...

It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

6:12 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

Ah thanks. So when it says "up to date" it doesn't mean "up to date" at all. It means "your working directory is still in the state it was last time you looked at it". Hm.

Hugh Cayless

6:53 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

Not quite. If you’d made any local commits but not pushed them up this would be a reminder that you need to do that.

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:12 , Lou Burnard wrote:

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

Ah thanks. So when it says "up to date" it doesn't mean "up to date" at all. It means "your working directory is still in the state it was last time you looked at it". Hm.

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

6:23 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused. 1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit". Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"? On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

6:39 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh. I am still puzzled though. What does this mean? remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong? On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...

I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

6:55 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

This sounds like a holdover from when James renamed the repo from Guidelines to TEI. Do git remote set-url origin https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git and you should never see that message again.

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

9:56 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it. Thanks, Hugh

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

10:55 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'. But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is. On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

10:59 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd shows the last commit was mine when I set the branch up a month ago. Is it possible you haven’t pushed the branch? Try git push origin lb42-pureodd and your changes should be synced up.

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 16:55 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch

lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'.

But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is.

On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote:

I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. I say "cd TEI; git status" It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

...
I say "git pull" It splurges a gazillion updates at me.

Che?

I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

...
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

11:20 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

The last changes I made in the P5 source were those which generate the "P5-subset-doctored" file needed to fix the problem with DTD generation and they appear as https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f On 28/09/15 21:59, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd shows the last commit was mine when I set the branch up a month ago. Is it possible you haven’t pushed the branch? Try

git push origin lb42-pureodd

and your changes should be synced up.

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 16:55 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch

lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'.

But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is.

On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote: > > I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. > I say "cd TEI; git status" > It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated.

> I say "git pull" > It splurges a gazillion updates at me. > > Che? > I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output.

> -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

11:26 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:20 , Lou Burnard wrote:

The last changes I made in the P5 source were those which generate the "P5-subset-doctored" file needed to fix the problem with DTD generation and they appear as https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f

On 28/09/15 21:59, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd> shows the last commit was mine when I set the branch up a month ago. Is it possible you haven’t pushed the branch? Try

git push origin lb42-pureodd

and your changes should be synced up.

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 16:55 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch

lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'.

But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is.

On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote: >> >> I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. >> I say "cd TEI; git status" >> It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" > There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated. > >> I say "git pull" >> It splurges a gazillion updates at me. >> >> Che? >> > I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output. > >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

11:31 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO -------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:20 , Lou Burnard wrote:

The last changes I made in the P5 source were those which generate the "P5-subset-doctored" file needed to fix the problem with DTD generation and they appear as https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f

On 28/09/15 21:59, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd> shows the last commit was mine when I set the branch up a month ago. Is it possible you haven’t pushed the branch? Try

git push origin lb42-pureodd

and your changes should be synced up.

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 16:55 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch

lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'.

But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is.

On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou

...
I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused.

1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. 2. I change one file 3. I say "git push" 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" 5. I say "git commit" 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit".

Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"?

On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote: >> >> I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. >> I say "cd TEI; git status" >> It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" > There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated. > >> I say "git pull" >> It splurges a gazillion updates at me. >> >> Che? >> > I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output. > >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

29 Sep 29 Sep

2:55 a.m.

New subject: [tei-council] gittery

I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax. Sent from my phone.

...

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:20 , Lou Burnard wrote:

The last changes I made in the P5 source were those which generate the "P5-subset-doctored" file needed to fix the problem with DTD generation and they appear as https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/19956016affc0ea26508a7fa37976c34525b828f

...
On 28/09/15 21:59, Hugh Cayless wrote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd <https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/tree/lb42-pureodd> shows the last commit was mine when I set the branch up a month ago. Is it possible you haven’t pushed the branch? Try

git push origin lb42-pureodd

and your changes should be synced up.

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 16:55 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Eh? I think all the pure ODD P5 changes are checked into that branch

lou@foxglove:~/Public/TEI-Pure$ git status On branch lb42-pureodd Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/lb42-pureodd'.

But this is just the changes to P5. I haven't checked in any of my changes to the Stylesheets yet, since a lot of them are just me futzing around getting diagnostics to see what's going wrong. If you cd P5, and then do a make clean; make html-web and look at the resulting specs you will see what the problem is.

...
On 28/09/15 20:56, Hugh Cayless wrote: Lou, I was going to take a look at PureOdd’s stylesheet issues, but it looks like you haven’t pushed the relevant changes to the lb42-pureodd branch yet. Can I help? I’d like to try to get an idea of what will be involved in fixing it.

Thanks, Hugh

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 12:39 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Ah, scrub that. I realised I am doing things in the wrong order. In my simple and svn-addled mind "commit" is the last thing you do, after pushing, whereas in git world we have to commit (locally) before we can push. Sigh.

I am still puzzled though. What does this mean?

remote: This repository moved. Please use the new location: remote: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI.git To https://github.com/TEIC/Guidelines.git a52bda5..4dd842a master -> master

It doesnt seem to matter, since my change shows up, but what am I doing wrong?

On 28/09/15 17:23, Lou > I'm sorry... I'm still dazed and confused. > > 1. I clone a fresh copy of P5. > 2. I change one file > 3. I say "git push" > 4. It thinks for a bit and then says "everything up-to-date" > 5. I say "git commit" > 6. It says "Your branch is up to date." However, it's noticed the file I changed but says it's not "staged for commit". > > Why doesn't "git push" "stage it for commit"? > > > > On 28/09/15 17:07, Hugh Cayless wrote: >>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:51 , Lou Burnard wrote: >>> >>> I have a clone of the main repo in my folder TEI. >>> I say "cd TEI; git status" >>> It says "your branch is up to date with origin/master" >> There are no changes in your working directory (i.e. new commits) that you haven’t pushed up to origin (Github). It’s not checking against what’s actually at origin, which may have changed since you last updated. >> >>> I say "git pull" >>> It splurges a gazillion updates at me. >>> >>> Che? >> I believe one or two of Martin’s recent updates affected a lot of files, so there’s going to be a lot of output. >> >>> -- >>> tei-council mailing list >>> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >>> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

12:13 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does. Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable. On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

...
On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

Hugh Cayless

1:26 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...

Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

1:58 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Fine by me. On 29/09/15 12:26, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

30 Sep 30 Sep

2:48 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

I’ve pushed up a first pass at Pure ODD display to a new "pureodd" branch on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets. It does both the Pure ODD content and the RelaxNG display. No attribute dataypes yet. Take a look and see what you think. There’s some formatting work to be done, but at least it gets the right info.

...

On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:58 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Fine by me.

On 29/09/15 12:26, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

3:17 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Great minds etc. I just fixed up my local copy to do much the same thing, in much the same way (though mine is a bit simpler and I prefer "Content model" to "Pure ODD" as the label). Now that there's a branch to play with, I will try and add my other changes into that. As soon as I've worked out how to (a) get hold of that branch (b) make the Makefile use it. On 30/09/15 13:48, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

I’ve pushed up a first pass at Pure ODD display to a new "pureodd" branch on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets. It does both the Pure ODD content and the RelaxNG display. No attribute dataypes yet. Take a look and see what you think. There’s some formatting work to be done, but at least it gets the right info.

...
On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:58 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Fine by me.

On 29/09/15 12:26, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Hugh Cayless

3:20 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Yeah, have at it. I’m just making stuff up as I go along :-). Do: git fetch git checkout pureodd and you’re away. Probably no need to do anything to the Makefile as long as you have the pureodd branch checked out.

...

On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:17 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Great minds etc. I just fixed up my local copy to do much the same thing, in much the same way (though mine is a bit simpler and I prefer "Content model" to "Pure ODD" as the label).

Now that there's a branch to play with, I will try and add my other changes into that. As soon as I've worked out how to (a) get hold of that branch (b) make the Makefile use it.

On 30/09/15 13:48, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I’ve pushed up a first pass at Pure ODD display to a new "pureodd" branch on https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets<https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets https://github.com/TEIC/Stylesheets>. It does both the Pure ODD content and the RelaxNG display. No attribute dataypes yet. Take a look and see what you think. There’s some formatting work to be done, but at least it gets the right info.

...
On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:58 , Lou Burnard wrote:

Fine by me.

On 29/09/15 12:26, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard > wrote: > > There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. > 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the > relaxng declarations generated from it. > 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the > named dataspec. > 3. We want to see the dataspecs. > My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go > on the others > > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Hugh Cayless > Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) > To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery > > When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I > thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the > PureOdd instead (or in addition to)? > > > -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

3:24 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

On 30/09/15 14:20, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...

Yeah, have at it. I’m just making stuff up as I go along :-).

Likewise!

...

and you’re away. Probably no need to do anything to the Makefile as long as you have the pureodd branch checked out.

I do, because by default the Makefile uses the copy of the Stylesheets installed in /usr/local/xml/tei .. however there is a little known cool feature of the makefile which allows some of the initial declarations to be locally overriden by using a file called local.mk

Hugh Cayless

3:29 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Fair enough. Sometimes I forget not everyone is using a bastardized OpenBSD operating system like me, meaning I never use the defaults.

...

On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:24 , Lou Burnard wrote:

On 30/09/15 14:20, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
Yeah, have at it. I’m just making stuff up as I go along :-).

Likewise!

...
and you’re away. Probably no need to do anything to the Makefile as long as you have the pureodd branch checked out.

I do, because by default the Makefile uses the copy of the Stylesheets installed in /usr/local/xml/tei .. however there is a little known cool feature of the makefile which allows some of the initial declarations to be locally overriden by using a file called local.mk

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

1 Oct 1 Oct

5:47 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Spurred on by Hugh's example, I've pushed up some more mods to the Stylesheets "pureodd" branch. We are now getting dataSpec reference documentation appearing correctly, as well as Pure content models. Sensible display of datatype contents remains elusive however.

Peter Stadler

30 Sep 30 Sep

9 a.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Am I correct that this is (related to) http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/560/ ? Best Peter

...

Am 29.09.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Hugh Cayless :

Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

Lou Burnard

12:39 p.m.

New subject: [tei-council] Pure ODD formatting (was Re: gittery)

Yes. On 30/09/15 08:00, Peter Stadler wrote:

...

Am I correct that this is (related to) http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/560/ ?

Best Peter

...
Am 29.09.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Hugh Cayless :

Ah, I didn't realize you wanted the PureODD on a separate row. That's probably easier. I guess we should talk about what to do with the RelaxNG (and other schema flavors?) at the F2F.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:

...
Good. As I said before, we should definitely be adding a row to the output table that shows the pure ODD view. It is probably easiest to clone that from the existing code that displays schematron rules (is that the "handle" you had in mind?) Whether we also retain the RelaxNG productions, or complete them with DTD and W3C schema, or whatever, is less clear to me. I'd be quite happy to see the RelaxNG disappear, but I anticipate a smallish outcry if it does.

Not sure what you mean by "interface work" here. There is a teeny bit of "interface" that enables the user to toggle between RNC and RNG views -- is that what you meant? But I think the pure ODD should be in a separate place, and not toggleable.

On 29/09/15 01:55, Hugh Cayless wrote:

...
I think I've got a handle on #1, but a bit of interface work will be needed so you can choose between Pure ODD and the two flavors of Relax.

Sent from my phone.

On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:31, Lou Burnard

...
wrote:

There are two issues, as I posted here a week or two ago. 1. We want to see the pure odd source for the content model not the relaxng declarations generated from it. 2. We want to see the datatype for an attribute as a pointer to the named dataspec. 3. We want to see the dataspecs. My fudged local Stylesheets fixes the last of these, but has a way to go on the others

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message -------- From: Hugh Cayless Date:09/28/2015 22:27 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] gittery

When I generate the HTML Guidelines, I see the RelaxNG content models. I thought there was an issue with that? Or is it just that we want to see the PureOdd instead (or in addition to)?

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived

3332

Age (days ago)

3335

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

24 comments

3 participants

participants (3)

Hugh Cayless
Lou Burnard
Peter Stadler

gittery

tags

participants (3)