Right, this is underspecified atm.
We need list of expected params and their types for every behaviour; in
cases where params invoke some special magic embedded in the function (as
is the case eg with place on note behaviour), a list of available values.
On 7 February 2016 at 19:50, Lou Burnard
On 07/02/16 19:30, Magdalena Turska wrote:
In your testprocmod.odd there are 3 issues: - one more or less your fault: link behaviour expects link param, not uri
Yes. This one is part of my general failure to understand how parameters work : I assume if I see an attribute @name="xxxx" that I can use whatever value I like. If not, shouldn't there be a <valList> somewhere with documented valItems?
Is it the TEI that decides what these @name values (or some of them) should be, and what they mean, or is it just something in your stylesheets? If the latter, obviously another procmod processor might expect different names.
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived