The only problem I can think of with Saturday is that the library doors don't open till 10 am (M-F it's 8). So if we were meeting in the library, we'd have to start later on Saturday. Which might not be a terrible thing. pfs On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 11:41, Hugh Cayless wrote:
The preponderance of votes was for 28-30 I think, and even for the earlier meeting in Durham, most people seemed to want a Thursday–Saturday meeting, so unless Paul has any reasons why that wouldn't work, let's say Ann Arbor, May 28-30.
Any objections?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Lou Burnard
wrote: I think the poll indicates, fwiw, two possible dates for Ann Arbor, both of which might be described as "end of May", i.e. 27-29 May, and 28-30 May.
Could we perhaps make a decision now? I have a preference for 28-30 may, fwiw, but can live with either. I can even live with the rival suggestion of Durham for 30-may2 if need be. The thing I cannot endure much longer is this protracted uncertainty ....
On 16/02/15 13:09, Paul Schaffner wrote:
As I suggested in a previous message, perhaps obscurely, I think that a date at the end of April or beginning of May would be next to impossible because it would coincide with the University graduation week/end, making it verra difficult to find a hotel room, much less ten or so. So if held here, it would have to be the later date (end of May, that is), simply as a logistical question.
pfs
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015, at 10:06, Hugh Cayless wrote:
I think we have a winner then. We have more votes for Ann Arbour, but we're evenly split as to date—5 for end of April, 5 for end of May. Paul hasn't voted yet, and as local organizer, I think it's appropriate that he have the deciding vote as to date. Paul, what works best for you?
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Fabio Ciotti
wrote: I've cast my vote, but since we abandoned the idea to have the meeting
in Boston at the end of April I have no deep preference for the location and the exact dates.
f
2015-02-14 12:50 GMT+01:00 Lou Burnard
: exactly. a vote for anything other than the two majority parties is a
vote wasted.
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message -------- From: Stefan Majewski
Date: 14/02/2015 11:47 (GMT+00:00) To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] Spring meeting But then, with a pick one choice, it's not much use of picking one of the infrequent choices, even when all others would be happy with this as
well.
In any case, if it's a method to agree on something rather soon it will
be
okay.
Cheers, Stefan Am 14.02.2015 01:03 schrieb "Hugh Cayless"
: I hope since we have to pick just one there will either be a clear > winner
or we'll at least be able to triangulate on a choice. > > Sent from my phone. > > On Feb 13, 2015, at 17:47, Syd Bauman
>> > wrote: Umm ... this is a just a "pick one" poll, so I'm not sure I see how >> it's going to be helpful. I'm OK with any of the choices, but have a >> mild preference for Ann Arbor over Boston, and Boston over Durham. >> But really, would be fine with Durham, too. >> >> Can I encourage those of you who haven't participated in the "let's >>> just choose a date and place" poll at >>> http://doodle.com/fk8qbq6rrrn7qugq to do so if you care at all >>> about the outcome? Right now, we're leaning (by one vote) toward >>> Durham at the end of April. >>> >>> I'll plan on closing the poll on Monday. >>> >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> > -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > > -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- Paul Schaffner Digital Library Production Service PFSchaffner@umich.edu | http://www.umich.edu/~pfs/