Re: [tei-council] rework of standoff proposal

Dear all, I am really pleased that you managed to put this effort on this. The discussion on Friday showed that this is a conceptual move that the council had to make it its own thing (“s’approprier” in French).

Le 30 mai 2015 à 23:20, Peter Stadler a écrit :

Dear all,

a Council working group (PFS, LB, MH, FC, SM, PWS) just created an alternative proposal as the "Ann Arbor" branch at https://github.com/laurentromary/stdfSpec/tree/AnnArbor. The changes in detail:

* killed mapStruct

Indeed. We need to wait until we have an appropriate concept for this. I see Andreas this week and we’ll wrap on this.

* renamed annotationGrp —> listAnnotation

I’ll tell Thomas ASAP so that he can have the named changed on the current ISO proposal. Does the semantics ofxxxGrp reflects that there are heterogeneous content objects there? (typically components of the triptych target-annotation-body in OA)

* renamed model.annotationPart —> model.annotation

I wasn’t happy with the xxxPart here. Sounds good!

* got rid of dash in module name

I don’t really care :-} (reminds me of a song by Elton John on the “Single Man” album

* removed class att.confidence in favor of https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/561/

I am looking forward to have this feature implemented.

* added some more elements to model.annotation

In any case this “module” is likely to be customized when used. It’s really open. So why not.

* removed standOffHeader in favor of teiHeader(!!)

Interesting… (not in the British sense). Let’s move ahead with this.

We did not update the examples yet.

That’s easy to do and I can contribute if there is a consensus on the above decisions.

I’m curious about Laurent’s reaction and will probably have a conf call in the next week with him (— Laurent?!)

Kudos to the council. How much of this can I take for stable in current implementations? Best wishes to all, Laurent

Best Peter

Laurent Romary INRIA laurent.romary@inria.fr