26 Jun
2015
26 Jun
'15
10:25 p.m.
On 26/06/15 17:32, Syd Bauman wrote:
... teidata.pointer Why are we changing its name from "data.pointer" to "teidata.pointer" just because it's defined differently? Are you keeping both definitions for some reason? I vaguely remember having this conversation a few weeks ago, with the upshot being "it takes work to convert to the new system". Am I remembering that correctly?
Yes, that sounds about right! When we started the exercise, the hope was to be able to maintain the two systems in parallel, just for caution's sake. The more I do it, however, the less convinced I am that this is actually necessary.