Re: [tei-council] #505 Redefine <msPart>

The general workaround for #661 is to provide an msName, right? Which I think is ok. In some cases the encoder might have to come up with a name, but I suspect that in most cases one will already exist, or there will be a formalism for generating one.

On Mar 17, 2015, at 6:00 , Peter Stadler wrote:

Dear all,

I think we can move on with the ticket 505 „redefine <msPart>“. A I read the responses on TEI-L, there is a majority in favor of widening the semantics of <msPart> to include fragments. The related issue #661 concerned with empty content of <msIdentifier> (or to make it optional) seems to get rejected, in contrast.

So, we need to alter the description of <msPart> as well as some prose as explained in [1]. Concerning examples, I can provide a 19th century letter …

Stefanie, would you like to go on and implement those changes?

Best Peter

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bpBPughQp5sOoB13iTMHMeRd88Mjv12_eGZiQXY-... -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived