Not sure... but in any case, I think the prose is right. On 15/03/16 15:32, Hugh Cayless wrote:
The prose is new too, isn't it?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Lou Burnard
wrote: I'd suggest removing the table for the moment. It doesn't express what the prose says and the prose was there first.
On 15/03/16 15:27, Syd Bauman wrote:
I'll take a look in a few hours ... In the meantime, did I commit my changes to TD and constrantSpec.xml properly?
1) The example immediately following the table contradicts the
information in the table in http://teic.github.io/TEI/ND.html#NDATTSda, because it has `@from`, `@notBefore`, and `@notAfter`.
2) Also, there's a French [example]( https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/blob/dev/P5/Source/Specs/att.datable.w3c.xml#L91 ) that uses `@when` in conjunction with `@notBefore` and `@notAfter`. I've switched the checks that enforce usage as outlined in the table to warnings, but we must fix `#1` and we should either remove the example in `#2` or change our minds about whether it's ok.
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived