
Hi Syd, I actually sent out the agenda and hangouts link on Tuesday. Hope everyone got it. Just in case: Our conference call is today, starting at 12:00Z-13:30Z (08:00-9:30 EDT, 13:00-14:30 BST, 14:00-15:30 CEST) This is the agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uGtDk4AoOvHXTV6EzdSeyo-D5ItsAz7PBnKtHIg8... Hangouts: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/brown.edu/teicouncil Best wishes, Martina -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tei-council <tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org> Im Auftrag von Syd Bauman Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2018 00:08 An: TEI Council <tei-council@lists.tei-c.org> Betreff: [Tei-council] meeting? RELAX NG namespace in Schematron Welcome aboard, Vanessa! Martina -- are we in fact meeting tomorrow, and if so a) at what time?[1,2] b) can you post the URLs for both the Hangout and the agenda & minutes sooner rather than later? All -- I'm working on the "normal" ODD->Schematron pathway (odds/extract-isosch.xsl, i.e. the process that creates a standalone Schematron schema, not the one that embeds Schematron into RELAX NG) in response to Stylesheets #250. The code in that program always generates an <sch:ns prefix="rng"> element to declare the RELAX NG namespace in the output Schematron. I presume when it was put in it was needed because some Schematron rule or other used "rng:" in its @context or @test attribute. But the string "rng:" does not occur in *any* attribute in all of P5 now. (And the only elements in the RELAX NG namespace are inside <egXML> or in data.XXX, soon to be deprecated.) So I am planning to nuke the automatic generation of <sch:ns prefix="rng"> in this routine. (It will still get generated if there are definitions that specify it on their @ns, or an <sch:ns> element that defines it, or it is a namespace in force for one of the definitions.) If anyone knows of a reason it should stay, please speak up soon (or revert my change). Notes ----- [1] 12:00Z = 08:00 EDT, 13:00 BST, 14:00 CEST 13:00Z = 09:00 EDT, 14:00 BST, 15:00 CEST Sorry, I don't know your time zone, Vanessa. [2] IIRC we agreed to 13:00Z, but then again, I thought we agreed not to have a teleconference the last Thu of Oct, too. _______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council