Re: [tei-council] Release? Bis

9 Oct 2015


      Nailed it. Roma is using 2.9.0 now.

Cheers,
Martin

On 15-10-09 01:59 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
...
No, that wasn't it; still investigating.
Cheers,
Martin
On 15-10-09 01:53 PM, Martin Holmes wrote:
...
Got it -- bug in the configuration file. Wrong port. Fixing now.
Cheers,
Martin
On 15-10-09 01:47 PM, Peter Stadler wrote:
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, don't know what's going wrong exactly but I configured the
exist-update-script to pick up the credentials from
~/etc/tei-exist.conf on the tei server.
Sorry, I won't be around longer but will look back tommorrow.
Best
Peter
Am 09.10.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Martin Holmes:
...
Peter should know about the eXist thing -- he configured the
authentication for it at one of the ftf meetings. Until that's
done, Roma is using the old data.
Cheers, Martin
On 15-10-09 12:52 PM, Hugh Cayless wrote:
...
Release is on the site, but step #8 (eXist reload) isn’t
running. Skipping it for now and proceeding.
...
On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:46 , Hugh Cayless 
wrote:
I guess I’ll do it then. Nobody touch anything!
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 11:38 , Martin Holmes 
> wrote:
>
> OK to go from me, but I'm only available for a few hours.
> I'd suggest we go very cautiously. What did we decide to do
> about the Stylesheets? There's absolutely nothing in our
> release procedures to handle them; we've always left that
> completely up to Sebastian. As far as I understand it, there
> are changes in Pure ODD that require a new release of the
> Stylesheets to work, so there's no point in doing P5 unless
> we do the Stylesheets too.
>
> In fact, perhaps it would make more sense to release the
> Stylesheets first. Before doing that, we should of course run
> all the P5 tests in the _current release_ of P5 against the
> Stylesheets trunk, to make sure we're not breaking anything.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> On 15-10-09 08:14 AM, Hugh Cayless wrote:
>> May I take the silence as assent?
>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 7:57 , Hugh Cayless
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I backed out @scope last night. Can we drop 2.9.0, or do
>>> we need further discussion?
>>>
>>
> -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
>
> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWGCf/AAoJEJclm6G69Xq2JpUIAITmVE8rIzfmMT+g33shAxXo
qToo4t6+iRBFosDd/mj32NWfPC/+M444XscOtHeixzz4W26ZTyaT4UZ2bVcFgQMO
qUC0PzmBnbFdp1HIV2E4FA6bQ8QpUI7kpinndue49oIz6CQOsTGvoC4tL8OTeRsE
5FCMIn47JOheCXSPdoMwKu+hVeyDayEVN/oZt9eA4l73FOj5DW6MjNtNKiltxoy7
NaNOHscF0iKAu7fOth2Uppd0khowi02dc2ID8GIuZvOljP+GVd7DrbwJMAKov4kz
8ZwD+uSL/xw+6t4fxjeSp72MMhCaArtLkN2DTCEz5AY319ECC3XIGGSA4A3PSRw=
=MkDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----