Since Mad is just publishing its final edition (https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/last-laugh-mad-magazine-will-soon-...), I vote for whatmeworry. Cheers, Martin On 2019-07-14 3:01 p.m., Elisa Beshero-Bondar wrote:
However(!) I'm having second thoughts, reviewing the measurement ticket and branch. I'd be happy to call this the "potrzebie" or the "whatmeworry" release, in commemoration of the measurement ticket and in honor of the first Mad Magazine example going into the Guidelines BIB (about the Potrzebie system with its whatmeworry Mad Magazine fictional power unit). Magdalena and I will debate it in the morning and decide on the codename. :-)
What, me worry? Elisa
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:09 PM Elisa Beshero-Bondar
mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu> wrote: I've checked our minutes from the May F2F meeting: We'd decided then to call this the "Rebel Release" and I like it very much. Also, as I'm supposed to make the release branch right now, I think the rebel associations with Bastille Day still apply. So! codename "rebel" okay?
cheers, Elisa
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 10:37 PM Syd Bauman
mailto:s.bauman@northeastern.edu> wrote: Hi, Martin. Not surprisingly I've already hit several of the things you note, and not others.
> Looks good. This is a slight typo: > "An additional information that the unit attribute may be unnecessary > when the unitRef attribute is present has been given (#1905)." > It should be either "An additional warning" or just "Additional > information".
Fixed.
> Also, I'm confused by this: > "The factor attribute has been added to the unit element, which shows > factors of numerical values given in a referenced unit element." > I thought the @formula attribute was the final decision? And its > datatype is XPath, surely?
There is no @factor, so I deleted this entire bit. (I did not fix the bit that is in there about @formula, though ... hope to do that in a few.)
> For the Japanese translations, I don't think I should be thanked; it's > Kiyonori's team that's done the actual translation, and what I've been > doing (which is nowhere near half-done) is largely mechanical. Good to > thank Hanna, but perhaps put her after Kiyonori.
Did not touch this.
I also commented out two items completely, as I consider them too minor to be in release notes (they are covered under the last bullet point for the Guidelines, "Corrections of typographic errors, improvements on explanations, and corrections of examples have been conducted in various sections of the Guidelines", which I'm not sure should be a bullet point, but perhaps a separate paragraph):
* The description of schema validation of co-occurrence constraints has been cleaned up slightly (#1770). [Also, this was not true, we deleted said description. The section from which it was deleted needs some work, BTW.]
* The change from http:// to https:// for relaxng.rng. _______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
-- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu Development site: http://newtfire.org http://newtfire.org/
-- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu Development site: http://newtfire.org http://newtfire.org/
_______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council