I've always said compiled ODD.
Resolved also makes sense.
James
--
Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
On 22 Oct 2016 18:29, Lou Burnard wrote:
Talking of naming, can we get a consensus on what we call the thing that
results from processing a TEI ODD with teitoodd ? It's analogous to the
p5subset.xml we know and love, so maybe we should call it a subset, not
an ODD (which is what teitoodd implies : give it foo.odd and you will
receive foo.odd.odd) . It isn't an ODD as we know it, obviously. But it
isn't necessarily a subset either. I think of it as a "compiled ODD" but
maybe that has the wrong connotations. Its distinguishing feature is
that any *Ref elements such as elementRef classRef etc. in the input
will have been resolved so maybe its a "resolved ODD" or an "explicit
ODD" ...
--
tei-council mailing list
tei-council@lists.tei-c.org
http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
