13 Mar
2015
13 Mar
'15
8:26 p.m.
Hi all, I just wanted to do a final check with you before acting on Bug 706 https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/706/. The comments seem to favour imposing a reverse chronological order of changes on listChange, but that would contradict the role of the optional attribute @ordered. Should we impose a reversed chronological order only when @ordered=true? Should we go as far as making @when required? The examples on the guidelines suggest a reverse chronological order when there is no @ordered and a chronological order when @ordered=true http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-listChange.html Thanks for your input, Raff