Re: [tei-council] langUsage content model

I'm wondering if we had decided that with the use of private-use-area language tags (like "en-x-BattleStarGalactica") we would no longer need <p> for straightforward prose, it can go in <language>. I think it makes sense to allow <p>[1], but since no one has complained for nearly a decade, perhaps we should just leave it alone. Notes ----- [1] But Lou and I disagree on what the content model should be. I do not like ( model.pLike+ | language+ ) because I think it is reasonable to want to have both a special <language> tag or two, AND a paragraph explicating some detail of or difficulty ascertaining the language usage. Thus I prefer ( language+, model.pLike* ) or ( ( language | model.pLike )+ )