I would go with 'b', recommended but other options possible. Perhaps
mentioning this is the only option that current implementations support,
though I do note that Guidelines are actually not mentioning implementation
at all, so won't press the issue.
Magdalena
On 5 February 2016 at 12:58, James Cummings
I would go with 'b', which I believe is cognate with <rendition> right? That we recommend CSS, all our examples use it, but you can technical use a different formally declared style language if you wish.
Sorry I've not converted my ODDs to pure ODD yet. Will try on the train back from Leeds tomorrow evening.
-J
On 05/02/16 12:34, Lou Burnard wrote:
Decision please. The current description of the processing model tacitly assumes that CSS is used to express output rendition, and it's hard to see how else the job would be done, but the text of the Guidelines is rather vague on the topic. Should we say a) outputRendition *must* be expressed using CSS b) it is *recommended* that CSS be used c) we don't care what you use, but our examples assume you will use CSS If we choose b or c, we will presumably need to add some complexity to the scheme (e.g. to say what has been used instead if it's not CSS)
-- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived