Re: [tei-council] rules for enforcing abstract model

There’s a lot here, so I’ll tackle it in 2 posts...

On Sep 30, 2015, at 23:05 , Syd Bauman wrote:

Hugh --

Are you still working on this? And it's in branch hcayless-appcrit, not branch appcrit, right? (Can we somehow sequester whichever one is *not* current? It's confusing.)

I’m not sure how "appcrit" got there. I’ve deleted it. I merged it into master, so that’s where we should be looking.

I haven't looked through all the rules carefully (but hope to be able to do so tomorrow). But I did notice at least one problem. Everywhere you have not( parent::tei:note ) it should probably be not( ancestor::tei:note ) lest, e.g., the <lg> in the structure

<p>This is a dangling paragraph describing superficial sights. <note> <p>An blatant reference to <title>The Dangling Conversation</title>, a Simon and Garfunkel song: <quote> <lg type="verse"> <l>In the dangling conversation</l> <l>And the superficial sighs</l> <l>The borders of our lives</l> </lg> </quote> </p> </note>

be flagged by "abstractModel-structure-l" as violating the abstract model.

Your example is perfectly valid though. I guess it wouldn’t be if the outer element were an <l>. I think that’s fixable, and I will do it.

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived