I'm in favour of a P6 label. Martin Holmes UVic Humanities Computing and Media Centre mholmes@uvic.ca ________________________________________ From: tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org <tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org> on behalf of James Cummings <James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk> Sent: November 23, 2015 5:40 AM To: tei-council@lists.tei-c.org Subject: Re: [tei-council] GitHub P6 label, anyone? All in favour of it... though I don't think we should worry too much about breaking backwards compatibility with that particular issue. (Since the solution is a trivial conversion and we could provide XSLT as a method of dealing with it.) FAND-sympathiser, -James On 23/11/15 09:10, Peter Stadler wrote:
I was just going through some tickets and came across #1400 „Remove numbered divisions“, wondering whether we need (or want) a P6 label? That way, we could start collecting issues for the day X. That would not necessarily mean that those changes be implemented in P6, but discussion is postponed until then. So, rather than simply closing the issue, we could label it first (and close it then, so it’s not polluting our issue tracker), making it easy to reopen these issues when the time comes.
Cheers Peter
-- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived