Hey! Refrigeration is soon upon us, and only 4 of you (at most) have stepped up to the plate to review <standOff> stuff. We will look pretty stupid if <standOff> is not in 3.7.0 at all, but I am telling you in no uncertain terms what we have needs to be reviewed. PLEASE grab a chapter or the model.resource tagdoc from https://docs.google.com/document/d/17S_W5vHzJZ_vCQw-Ze6SbOebqfz5KHq0xR9wauBn... and compare it to the corresponding chapter in the dev branch, looking for problems where there are differences. Someone who can build locally or download the schemas needs to play with the new schemas (mostly looking at upper-level <TEI>, <teiCorpus>, and <standOff> stuff). Also, please put your initials in with your comments so I know who I'm chatting with. (BTW, I have made changes or otherwise addressed every comment made so far.)
Stuff that's been done: * changed model.resourceLike to model.resource, and removed <TEI> from it * added new model.describedResource, which contains only <TEI> and <teiCorpus> * changed content models of <TEI> and <teiHeader> as discussed * created new <standOff> and model.standOffPart (to SA) * tweaked various bits of prose, e.g. the <remarks> for <settingDesc>, to talk about new <standOff> * updated the beginning of DS * changed prose and an example or two in CC where it talks about major structures for corpora to allow for nested <TEI> * tweaked prose in FS where free-standing <fsdDecl> is mentioned * tweaked prose in MS where <person> is discussed * changed an example in CO to show <standOff> * added a paragraph to DR about using <standOff> for a <castList> * changed prose and an example or two in ND to accommodate <standOff> * tweaked prose in PH to mention that <listTranspose> could be in <standOff> * tweaked beginning of SA, and added an entire new subsection later on, to discuss <standOff> - NOTE: left a stub "Placement of Stand-off Markup and Contextual Information" section that I haven't figured out if it should be kept or deleted, pr new subsection should be moved into it, or what * tweaked TS to remove implication that <listPerson> must be in <particDesc> (although for typical transcriptions of speech it may well be)
What I think should be done next is each member of Council should pick one changed chapter and do a quick comparison of it between branch sydb-standOff and dev, reading the changed portions to see if they're OK.[1] In addition, a few people should read the <standOff> tagdoc and play with the schemas.
So here is a checklist: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17S_W5vHzJZ_vCQw-Ze6SbOebqfz5KHq0xR9wauBn... Please sign up for at least 1 chapter. Note that each chapter or tagdoc name is a link to the sydb-standOff version thereof. It would be good if all the reviews could be done by early Fri morning 24 Jan my time (EST).
Notes ----- [1] For me the easiest way to do this is to put the dev and sydb-standOff versions of the HTML in two tabs in one window and pop back and forth between them. But to each his or her own. (But do note that there have been whitespace changes to some of the source files, so GitHub's compare functionality may not be ideal.)