Excellent! Did the "cos-nonambig" error just disappear or have you not tested for that? On 05/02/16 22:05, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Thanks! Ok, everything is in PureODD now and all files validate.
Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
<dataRef name="string" restriction="indent\d"/>
On 05/02/16 20:24, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Hi Lou,
I'm trying to redefine our datatypes in pure ODD, but one of them uses a regex:
<content> <rng:choice> <rng:value>right</rng:value> <rng:value>center</rng:value> <rng:value>left</rng:value> <rng:data type="string"> <rng:param name="pattern">indent\d</rng:param> </rng:data> </rng:choice> </content>
I understand I can use <valList> for the first three values, but what about the last one?
Thanks, Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Come come you're too modest : what about that thing called um, what was
it, dimple, or pimple, or something?
On 05/02/16 16:03, Magdalena Turska wrote:
I'm a bit ashamed but indeed I do not have ODDs of my own to test.
On 5 February 2016 at 15:56, Raffaele Viglianti < raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Lou,
I converted the Shelley Godwin Archive ODD to PureODD last week. Sorry for not following up sooner.
The ODD is here:
https://github.com/umd-mith/sga/blob/master/data/odd/shelley-godwin-page.odd
Everything seems to work fine, but I have two comments / questions:
1) Datatypes (macroSpec[@type='dt']) are still defined in RNG, correct? We define some custom datatypes in our ODD and I still had to use RNG
2) The XSD that gets generated returns a "cos-nonambig" error on tei:list. We don't touch tei:ist in the ODD however. We have always only generated RNG, so I'm not sure whether this problem is new (ie caused by Pure ODD, or it's always been there)
I hope to find the time to give a stab at the MEI ODD too (that will be fun), but I will need a converter script there, because it's a *huge* ODD.
Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
I haven't heard from anyone since I asked Council members to check that
> their existing ODDs continue to work as expected using the > lb42-pureodd > branch. So maybe no Council members actually have any ODDs to check, > or > maybe those who do have all checked and have nothing to report, or > maybe > they just haven't got round to it yet. I don't know, but just in case > > it's the 3rd possibility, please could I urge you to give it a go this > weekend? If you prefer, you could just bung me a copy of the ODD and I'll test > it > for you! > > Why the pressure? Well, mostly that I've just been reminded that we're > aiming for a pre-release freeze for the end of the current month, and > I'm > going to be buried in the French countryside with only intermittent > net > access until then. > > > -- > tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > > -- > tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived