By the way, and FWIW, I asked Peter Boot for a copy of his ODD, and checked that it generated a valid RelaxNG schema using the lb42-pure-odd branch. Seems to have worked, once I added his namespace to the list of those excluded from macro.anyXML. On 08/12/15 14:03, Lou Burnard wrote:
Yes, that was my understanding, but I don't think he is. After I fixed the detest bug in the dev branch, I got a notification from his Oxonian incarnation, but the Victorian one remains silent sfaics.
On 08/12/15 13:43, Martin Holmes wrote:
Hi Lou,
Mr Jinks should write to the Council list "when a build fails, becomes unstable or returns to stable". It's building P5 now, so we'll see if it does. I've configured mine to build the PureODD branch after P5 if P5 succeeds.
Cheers, Martin
On 15-12-08 05:03 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
Have fixed the detest.log in expected results in the dev branch so that the test should not fail.
Mr Jenkins doesnt seem to tell me when failures occur any more, so I can't tell whether this worked or not though.
On 07/12/15 13:41, Martin Holmes wrote:
... However, if the two branches get out of sync in other ways, then that won't hold so well. Perhaps you should apply your fix for Syd's Schematron problem to the main branch too.
Cheers, Martin
However, the main build has been broken for a few days by either Lou or Syd:
http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5-Test/lastFailedBuild/changes
So that needs to be fixed before we can expect the rest to build OK. Yes. The detest expected output has changed as a result of Syd's new schematron rule, so that needs to be updated. I have fixed this in the lb42-pureodd-2 branch.