The "cos-nonambig" error is still there :( On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Excellent! Did the "cos-nonambig" error just disappear or have you not tested for that?
On 05/02/16 22:05, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Thanks! Ok, everything is in PureODD now and all files validate.
Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk
wrote:
<dataRef name="string" restriction="indent\d"/>
On 05/02/16 20:24, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
Hi Lou,
I'm trying to redefine our datatypes in pure ODD, but one of them uses a regex:
<content> <rng:choice> <rng:value>right</rng:value> <rng:value>center</rng:value> <rng:value>left</rng:value> <rng:data type="string"> <rng:param name="pattern">indent\d</rng:param> </rng:data> </rng:choice> </content>
I understand I can use <valList> for the first three values, but what about the last one?
Thanks, Raff
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Come come you're too modest : what about that thing called um, what was
it, dimple, or pimple, or something?
On 05/02/16 16:03, Magdalena Turska wrote:
I'm a bit ashamed but indeed I do not have ODDs of my own to test.
On 5 February 2016 at 15:56, Raffaele Viglianti < raffaeleviglianti@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi Lou, > > I converted the Shelley Godwin Archive ODD to PureODD last week. > Sorry > for > not following up sooner. > > The ODD is here: > > > > > https://github.com/umd-mith/sga/blob/master/data/odd/shelley-godwin-page.odd > > Everything seems to work fine, but I have two comments / questions: > > 1) Datatypes (macroSpec[@type='dt']) are still defined in RNG, > correct? > We > define some custom datatypes in our ODD and I still had to use RNG > > 2) The XSD that gets generated returns a "cos-nonambig" error on > tei:list. > We don't touch tei:ist in the ODD however. We have always only > generated > RNG, so I'm not sure whether this problem is new (ie caused by Pure > ODD, > or > it's always been there) > > I hope to find the time to give a stab at the MEI ODD too (that will > be > fun), but I will need a converter script there, because it's a *huge* > ODD. > > Raff > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Lou Burnard < > lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> > wrote: > > I haven't heard from anyone since I asked Council members to check > that > > their existing ODDs continue to work as expected using the >> lb42-pureodd >> branch. So maybe no Council members actually have any ODDs to check, >> or >> maybe those who do have all checked and have nothing to report, or >> maybe >> they just haven't got round to it yet. I don't know, but just in >> case >> >> it's >> > the 3rd possibility, please could I urge you to give it a go this > >> weekend? >> > If you prefer, you could just bung me a copy of the ODD and I'll test > >> it >> for you! >> >> Why the pressure? Well, mostly that I've just been reminded that >> we're >> aiming for a pre-release freeze for the end of the current month, >> and >> I'm >> going to be buried in the French countryside with only intermittent >> net >> access until then. >> >> >> -- >> tei-council mailing list >> tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council >> >> PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived >> >> -- >> >> tei-council mailing list > tei-council@lists.tei-c.org > http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > > PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived > > > -- > tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived