Yes, as we discussed this this is an improvement and I can see any caveat.
Cheers,
Stefan
Am 31.05.2015 10:58 schrieb "Hugh Cayless"
I think this is fine, and addresses a need I've heard expressed in other contexts.
Sent from my phone.
On May 31, 2015, at 10:41, Fabio Ciotti
wrote: I strongly supported this yesterday so go for me f
2015-05-31 16:05 GMT+02:00 Peter Stadler
: I see this as an improvement and can’t see any pitfalls.
Cheers Peter
Am 31.05.2015 um 10:02 schrieb Martin Holmes
: Hi all,
This ticket:
https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/feature-requests/561/
arose out of our re-working yesterday of Laurent's standoff proposal. I'd like to fast-track it if we can; it seems straightforward to me, and doesn't involve any Birnbaum issues. While I get around to figuring out the actual change to the Spec file, could you all check to see if you have any objections to it in principle?
Cheers, Martin -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- Fabio Ciotti Dipartimento Studi Umanistici, UniversitĂ di Roma Tor Vergata Presidente Associazione Informatica Umanistica Cultura Digitale -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived