Yes. And like with a normal odd in a chained odd you have to moduleRef all the modules from the source that are going to be used in your subset. You don't get everything in the source by default, the first ODD just limits what is in the source that you have available to choose from in your second ODD. James -- Dr James Cummings, Academic IT Services, University of Oxford On 20 Oct 2016 19:07, Hugh Cayless <philomousos@gmail.com> wrote: Well, I think if you had a moduleRef, then you could delete it with an elementSpec, you just can't use the elementSpec without the moduleRef. I think tests and better documentation of this would be a grand idea. Sent from my phone.
On Oct 20, 2016, at 13:43, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
On 20/10/16 18:23, Hugh Cayless wrote: The way I was thinking about it: every ODD has to declare the modules it's using.
Aren't moduleRef/@exclude and elementSpec/@mode='delete' basically equivalent anyway?
Yes. Which is why I am puzzled that one works and the other doesn't.
I suggest it might help to create a little test suite... -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived