Just in case it's useful, I've created a new Jinks job to build the lb42-pureodd-2 branch. However, the main build has been broken for a few days by either Lou or Syd: http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5-Test/lastFailedBuild/changes So that needs to be fixed before we can expect the rest to build OK. Cheers, Martin On 15-12-06 01:35 PM, Lou Burnard wrote:
Glad to say that nearly all of my yesterday winges are no longer an issue. After a morning wasted barking resolutely up the wrong tree, I checked out a fresh copy of the lb42-pureodd-2 branch and spent the rest of the weekend bringing it up to speed.
If you check out commit 5e9864a you should now have something which will run the Makefile successfully to completion. If you have also installed the pureodd branch of the Stylesheets, you should see sensible HTML web pages. Even more amazingly, if you run "make pdf" you will get a not at all bad version of the Guidelines in PDF. https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/commit/5e9864a6b15b6541f81dba1367c570a31d24aea0
But I still dont like the class information being repeated inside the Pure ODD section, and I still don't think element names should be clickable inside examples.
But I now declare this branch ready for merging -- as soon as at least one other person has managed to run the makefile to completion!
On 05/12/15 11:49, Lou Burnard wrote:
I am now at the stage of being able to generate web pages in the lb42-pureodd-2 branch. To get there, I have had to comment out of the makefile the two "EXTENDED" test files testp4compat.xsd and testi18n.xsd (the latter was already commented out in fact). Can anyone remember/reconstruct what these tests were intended to do?
I am also now using Hugh's latest Stylesheets, so have some further comments to make on them:
Firstly, what appears to be a bug: in the pureODD section, I see nothing at all inside the <content> element. e.g. in emph. This looks OK at http://teic.github.io/TEI/ref-emph.html but not in the version I have locally generated, so either the former is not up to date, or I have messed something up.
Secondly, I still don't want to see class declarations inside that section
Thirdly, I don't want to see element names clickable inside examples. This is not what we currently do; I find it distracting; and it's strictly speaking wrong, since example contents are not in the TEI namespace! :-) [this also doesn't happen in the github.io version]