Hi all, What is our policy on keeping old branches around? I suppose it makes sense to keep the release ones (for awhile at least), but I've just gone and deleted the att.global.source one since I believe that all got merged in. Why do some branches that have been merged in seem to still be X number of commits ahead of dev? I notice that we have 23 branches so wondered if we shouldn't be getting rid of some of those. The current list of branches is at: https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/branches/all Ones that I'd probably assume should be deleted include: lb42-procmod (I assume this is all merged in though it says 498/25 (that is 498 behind dev, 25 ahead) .. that 25 makes me nervous. msFrag (517 behind) hcayless-appcrit (674/32) sydb-xenodata (691/65) peterstadler-antify (13560/12861 !) Not sure what this was for? Peter? P5 (13566/56) Might be a confusing branch name? Was this an archival one? Rename if keeping? P5-Council (last updated 8 years ago? Is this a historical one? Does it have anything interesting?) P5-selections (updated 10 years ago by sydb) Just thought I'd mention it since I think we should have branches for dev, master, release-X.Y.Z, gh-pages, and $anythingWeAreCurrentlyWorkingOn (Plus maybe a couple historical ones like sf/trunk?) What do others think? -James -- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford