Thanks Syd
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Syd Bauman
Fabio, Hugh, and I dissented, believing it would better not to have @scope than to have it w/o a suggested values list.
I think I agree with this - apologies again for having been silent on the
matter for too long, so I don't know if my vote still counts
@scope is also now defined as the wrong datatype, about which I'll be answering Hugh in a minute in the hopes that we can correct at least one of our egregious errors before we release Guidelines that explicitly and deliberately fail to provide guidance that we can quite easily predict would be useful.
The difference between data.enumerated and data.word is subtle, I look forward to your explanation. In a different thread I was suggesting an entirely different datatype for @scope. Which is the reason behind my (very late) support for not including @scope in the release. Raff
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived