genetic/ and TEIOO-Deprecated/? Especially the latter. I you have to rename a folder and put "Deprecated" in its name, it's time for it to go, I think. :-) +1 on adding a top-level HISTORICAL_README which can be used to record major structural changes Actually, it would be best practice to add a top-level README as well, that lays out the structure of the repo and tells people in general how to do useful things. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
If the majority is in favour of deletion rather than hiding under the sofa, do we have a consensus as to which of the items listed in my pedvious message on this thread should be deleted? and on the criteria for deletion?
On 30/01/15 13:26, Peter Stadler wrote:
Am 30.01.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Majewski Stefan <stefan.majewski@onb.ac.at
:
The one reason against deletion is, that it becomes a bit difficult to find deleted stuff in SVN. One way to make this easier would be to have a HISTORICAL_README with the deletions documented or, which I would prefer, a tag in the commit message saying "DELETE filename" (or maybe repopath). Then it is quite easy to spot deletions without having to svn diff.
`svn log -v` will give you the information whether a file was added, modified or deleted …
Peter
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived