9 Jun
2015
9 Jun
'15
12:23 p.m.
Because then you can't have datatype and dataRef coexisting. On 09/06/15 17:19, Syd Bauman wrote:
"data.count" is never going to be defined by a <dataSpec>. The proposal is to use a different name e.g. "teidata.count". I understand the proposal, but I don't get why. Why not just change the definition of 'data.count' from being declared with <macroSpec> to being declared with <dataSpec>?