Hi Syd, I have some minor remarks on the rewrite: #DEFCON 1) ":" is missing before the enumeration of the three distinctly different ways of specifying a content model. Do you want to use <list rend="bulleted"> for that? #DEFCONTEI 2) I would change the last sentence of the first paragraph to "as the only content of the content element". Is it necessary to emphasize that <empty> is an empty element? It makes the sentence hard to read. If you decide to keep it, you should also add 'empty' before <textNode> further down for continuity. 3) for consistency reasons I'd delete the "an" in the specification of <alternate> 4) explanation of the second example: is it worth to mention the difference in using the cardinality on <elementRef> or <alternate>? 5) I wonder if there should be a simple example on using <sequence>? <content> <sequence> <elementRef key="ab"/> <elementRef key="cd"/> </sequence> </content> 7) the <anyElement> is not mentioned in the section (resp. the whole chapter) any more. 8) should there be an example using <classRef> OR <macroRef> too? 9) @bibliography on the left: that's only on the paderborn jenkins, see: http://teijenkins.hcmc.uvic.ca/job/TEIP5-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/P5... Best wishes, Martina -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org [mailto:tei-council-bounces@lists.tei-c.org] Im Auftrag von Syd Bauman Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Jänner 2018 19:37 An: TEI Council Betreff: [tei-council] TD section redo Per ticket 1459 and Council's directive in Victoria, I have re-written the content model section of TD. Please read through both the prologue of * http://jenkins-paderborn.tei-c.org/job/TEIP5-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifac... and its first subsection, * http://jenkins-paderborn.tei-c.org/job/TEIP5-dev/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifac... (they are both quite short: < 800 words of prose and 4 examples total) and let me know what you think. BTW, I note that in each example the link to the bibliography has migrated to the left. While politically I'm OK with that, aesthetically it's awful. -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived