PS: Correction: If we hold the TEI Council meeting on that *day* of Tuesday
1/14, I won't be able to make it. (But I can attend on Thursday that week
or the following Tuesday.)
Thanks,
Elisa
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 2:25 PM Elisa Beshero-Bondar
Syd--thanks for looking ahead at calendars about meetings! I need to tell everyone in confidence that I am doing an all-day campus job interview on Tuesday 1/14, so if we are holding the TEI Council meeting that week, I may not (meaning, almost certainly cannot) attend. Since Raff and I are release techs on the next release, and since I've been doing a lot of revisions in the past month to documentation that I want to ask the group about, I really don't want to miss this particular meeting! Can we move the meeting possibly to Thursday just that week (1/16), or by one week later, to Tuesday 1/21?
Thanks all! Elisa
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 2:10 PM Bauman, Syd
wrote: [Originally sent Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:51:27 -0500, but bounced due to a networking problem here with my Northeastern machine. You may notice that this is not a true reply, just a new e-mail with a subject line that looks like it is a reply. Sigh. Note that I will likely have trouble sending e-mail for some time to come.]
So, it sounds like we should move the January Stylesheets group meeting to Tue 21 Jan 20 at 14:00Z. That is: 06:00 PST 09:00 EST 14:00 GMT 15:00 CET (Do we have any other time zones represented on Council?)
Unless I hear strenuous objections pretty soon, we will plan on that.
I am likely to miss the Council meeting of Tue 14 Jan 20 14:00Z. (I will be traveling in London; depending on train schedules, my family, etc., I may be able to make it, but I am not counting on it.)
Whether I make it or not, I hope the topic of keeping the Docker containers updated is discussed. My thoughts on this topic follow, in no particular order.
* It is definitely important to keep the OS running in a Docker container up to date with security patches. It may not be as big a problem as Martin worries it is, especially if we are all vigilant in leaving a container running for the minimum amount of time necessary. But it is still important enough that we should have a process for doing it.
* The solution is probably administrative, not technical.
* It is probably unfair to insist that Peter and Hugh be solely responsible for doing this. (That said, if they don't object, I don't either. I would if it were only 1 person -- at least 2 people should know how to do everything that is even semi-important.) Could be a rotating responsibility.
* My suggested administrative idea: Once a month, 1-24 hours *before* the Council meeting, the Docker maintainer or designee should update each container with the latest OS security patches. (Chair should send a reminder 48 hours before the meeting.) Immediately *after* the Council meeting each Council member should download and install the updated container.
* Peter pointed out that doing such an update might break the build within the container. He's right, but that's no reason not to install security patches. It's a reason to fix the build process so it works on a properly updated system. Doing this on meeting day, I figure, gives us a higher chance of noticing a build fail, finding a fix, and promulgating the solution rapidly.
_______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
-- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu
Development site: http://newtfire.org
--
Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD
Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English
University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division
150 Finoli Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601 USA
E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu