Hi all,
I’m looking at ways to replace the current changelog generation routine for Git, and have a formatting question. It’s pretty easy to come up with something that’s close, but not identical, to the current format. My question is whether that is good enough, of if there’s some reason to stick with the old format as-is. The old format is:
2015-03-10 Lou Burnard
Changed paths:
M /trunk/P5/Source/Guidelines/en/DS-DefaultTextStructure.xml
M /trunk/P5/Source/Guidelines/en/USE.xml
M /trunk/P5/Source/Specs/TEI.xml
clarify structure of TEI element per bug #742
And it would be replaced by:
2015-03-10 Lou Burnard 9fc47c4
clarify structure of TEI element per bug #742
M P5/Source/Guidelines/en/DS-DefaultTextStructure.xml
M P5/Source/Guidelines/en/USE.xml
M P5/Source/Specs/TEI.xml
The short-form commit hash above is an optional extra. We didn’t include svn rev numbers before. Another simple alternative is:
2015-03-10 Lou Burnard 9fc47c4
clarify structure of TEI element per bug #742
P5/Source/Guidelines/en/DS-DefaultTextStructure.xml | 6 ++++--
P5/Source/Guidelines/en/USE.xml | 6 +++++-
P5/Source/Specs/TEI.xml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Which gives more detail about the nature of the changes. Thoughts?
