On 15-07-31 12:21 AM, Lou Burnard wrote:
I note that these are all XSLT-1 stylesheets, and therefore a priori no longer used. My guess is that the "pantor" concerned is the one to do with colours, not stock trading.
Not quite all -- I think, having looked at logs and contacted Sebastian, that he purged all the Pantor stuff from the Stylesheets, but some got left in the P5 tree. Three of the files are not XSLT-1 files. But I think we can purge them. I'll try it today. I don't think it's anything to do with Pantone; pantor.com always seems to have been a tech/finance operation: https://web.archive.org/web/20010304010909/http://www.pantor.com/ but I think one of their tech people wrote a nice RNG-to-RNC converter which we borrowed. I'll try making these changes first in the test GitHub repo, then do them for real in SF. Cheers, Martin
Before doing a move from sf to git, it would clearly be a good idea to do a spring clean of these and other old rubbish. For example, there are multiple copies of the genetic workgroup's sample files, which are quite large.
And, re vacation, yes isn't it.
On 30/07/15 23:53, Martin Holmes wrote:
In Utilities/guidelines.xsl.model, I see this:
xmlns:pantor="http://www.pantor.com/ns/local"
and something similar in the following files:
Query/simplify.xsl Utilities-1/colorsvg.xsl Utilities-1/divsplit.xsl Utilities-1/generate-label.xsl Utilities-1/guidelines-latex.xsl Utilities-1/guidelines-print.xsl Utilities~1/guidelines.xsl.model Utilities~1/odd2ebnf.xsl Utilities~1/odd2exodd.xsl Utilities~1/rng2ebnf.xsl Utilities~1/split.xsl Utilities/guidelines-print.xsl
Sometimes it maps to the prefix "pantor" and sometimes to the prefix "local".
pantor.com seems to be some kind of electronic stock trading platform:
The Stylesheets repo contains a file called RngToRnc.xsl, which is an ancient stylesheet apparently dating back to 2002, last edited by Syd in 2010. But this does not appear to use the pantor: or local: prefixes, and neither prefix seems to be actually used anywhere.
Does anyone have any recollection of what was going on here? If we're not using this namespace, it would be good to get rid of it, especially since it's usually rather confusingly mapped to the prefix "local".
Cheers, Martin