Hi-- I haven't been jumping to the fore mostly because I haven't been on
Council terribly long, but:
* I like Presentation #1 and I'm happy to help out with it in any way that
works. I'm a little worried, by the way, about Martin Mueller's peeps in
his latest messages about his sense that Council's role ought to change--he
seems to think that maintaining the Guidelines is problematic or too
limited. I really want to help counter that perspective: the Guidelines are
important, difficult, require a LOT of conversation, debate, and
reflection, and careful writin. Can I talk about that as a Newbie on
Council who is very impressed with the effort we've been putting in? I'd
hate to see us stuck with other roles that outsiders from Council might
think better suited to us, if people don't understand the serious work
we're already doing(!)
* I'm happy to be a stooge in the audience, too--I'm good at interjecting
pointed questions--but Presentation #1 has a strong pull for me.
Thanks,
Elisa
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:52 AM, James Cummings
I've not volunteered since I'm already speaking/doing too much at the conference this year. However, I'd happily be one of the stooges in the audience ready and willing to ask leading questions or similar if necessary.
I would note that none of these really answer what Martin Mueller has proposed as "Whither TEI: The Next Thirty Years".
-James
On 06/09/16 15:14, Raffaele Viglianti wrote:
If nobody is passionate about presentation #1, I'd be happy to take it on. Maybe someone with more experience could back me up on the release part (particularly re: Oxygen components) Raff
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Hugh Cayless
wrote: Reminder: we need at least 2 more volunteers to present during the Council
session. Don't all shout at once!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E1SEMfxvhhm_ I9fAwFzOMXOl6mLy02o10aJWQt7BfhM/edit?usp=sharing
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk wrote:
I certainly have no objection, though I think I can predict the outcome.
In other mail from the Board I see that the TEI's problems are largely because "social facts" often contradict "actual facts", and there clearly is an established "social fact" that customization is hard and unnecessary, even though we keep saying it's neither. So we need either to find a better way of saying it, or give up. Not the least irritating aspect of this is that those who refuse to do customisation then proceed to reproach the TEI system with being too large and complex, or not sufficiently customized to their
needs.
On 01/09/16 16:17, Hugh Cayless wrote:
Your name's on it! Do you think doing that sort of survey would be
useful?
I'd kind of like to know what the TEI user on the street thinks about
the
question of whether to pick a standard schema vs. customize your own.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Lou Burnard < lou.burnard@retired.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Happy to volunteer for number 2 !
Sent from my Honor Mobile
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [tei-council] Whither TEI Sessions From: Hugh Cayless To: TEI Council CC:
I've tried to distill the ideas in the Google Doc into 3 presentations. Can you all take a look and see if you agree with my choices? We'll need volunteers for each talk, which will entail writing and giving a short presentation (definitely under 10 minutes, 5 would be ideal). We also need a moderator. The rest of us should be available to the presenters as support both before and during the session.
I think all of the talks would benefit from canvassing the community beforehand. I did a little thinking about what a survey of
customization
usage might look like and put some sample questions in there.
Any feedback from the community should be solicited ASAP, I think,
since
we're less than 4 weeks out.
Thanks, Hugh -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
-- Dr James Cummings, James.Cummings@it.ox.ac.uk Academic IT Services, University of Oxford
-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived
--
Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD
Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English
University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division
150 Finoli Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601 USA
E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu