Re: [tei-council] release plan

Hi Peter and all, I took about 30 minutes again reviewing the proposal from issue 1671 (the ticket with all the discussion is 1670:https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1670 https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1670 ). I think the @join attribute is fine as proposed because it’s already an ISO standard, and exemplified in 1670 as well as in Maik Stührenberg’s 2012 article in JTEI: “The TEI and Current Standards for Structuring Linguistic Data”: http://journals.openedition.org/jtei/523 http://journals.openedition.org/jtei/523 (search for “join” to zoom to the example). If we don’t have issues with this example, presumably we’re okay with Piotr’s pull request here? In our minutes from the Victoria F2f, we asked "We think @join is fine but wonder if a different name could be used, or is that exactly what this is called in ISO 24611?” I looked it up, and the ISO standard referenced here is from 2012: ISO 24611:2012 (en) and the section with the join attribute is B3.2. (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:24611:ed-1:v1:en https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:24611:ed-1:v1:en ) A sidenote and a rookie question: Because ISO standards are often relevant to our work, it seems like we ought to be able to access them fully—but this one doesn’t come free. Does TEI have some special mode of access to ISO standards, such as an ANSI membership? Cheers, Elisa -- Elisa Beshero-Bondar, PhD Director, Center for the Digital Text | Associate Professor of English University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg | Humanities Division 150 Finoli Drive Greensburg, PA 15601 USA E-mail: ebb8@pitt.edu mailto:ebb8@pitt.edu Development site: http://newtfire.org http://newtfire.org/

On Jan 15, 2018, at 10:41 AM, Peter Stadler wrote:

Dear all,

the build seems to be broken right now (or am I wrong)? Can we fix this before refrigerating?

Additionally, I’d like to please Piotr and accept his PR https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/pull/1671 concerning issue https://github.com/TEIC/TEI/issues/1670. IMHO, the only question for us is whether anyone feels strong to come up with a more general application (and name) for the proposed attribute @join? Otherwise, I’ll merge …

Best Peter

...

Am 15.01.2018 um 15:25 schrieb Scholger, Martina (martina.scholger@uni-graz.at) :

Refrigerate: Thu 18 - Wed 24 January. In this period no major changes which could possibly break the schema should be done any more. Minor changes (prose, typos) are fine until the 24th.

-- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council

PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived