#DEFCON
Take a look at https://bauman.zapto.org/~syd/temp/4TEICouncil/TD_DEFCON.html and let me know what you think.
I'm in favour of the list
#DEFCONTEI
3) for consistency reasons I'd delete the "an" in the specification of <alternate>
I think both the <desc> for <sequence> and the <desc> for <alternate> are pretty lame. How about: <sequence>: indicates that the constructs referenced by its children form a sequence <alternate>: indicates that the constructs referenced by its children form an alternation
Agreed, this is much better
4) explanation of the second example: is it worth to mention the difference in using the cardinality on <elementRef> or <alternate>?
I don't think it can hurt, but I was sort of thinking (at the time) that even what I have is overkill, as this is covered in the Gentle Introduction to XML (at #SG146).
Agreed as well, if one wants to change the content model they are likely aware of the difference... -- tei-council mailing list tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council PLEASE NOTE: postings to this list are publicly archived