Dear All,
Having experimented with PDFs and print outputs for a number of projects now, I am very much against having the print output "tail" wagging the digital "dog." I also wonder how many people use PDFs of the Guidelines? Even as a daily user of the Guidelines, I didn't even know we had a PDF output.
Trying to hack the encoding so that the PDF will build seems wrong in all kinds of ways.
J.
Janelle Jenstad, Associate Professor, Department of English, University of Victoria
Director, Map of Early Modern London; Director, Linked Early Modern Drama Online
Coordinating Platform Editor, Digital Renaissance Editions
Email: jenstad@uvic.ca, lemdo@uvic.ca, or london@uvic.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: Tei-council
Hi Martin,
As Peter mentions, there may be other issues with the PDF build, but I *think* what's going on is that the GLs building processes are trying to italicise fonts (Noto CJK fonts) that don't have an Italic form. I guess that's not a thing—I wasn't aware of it. Trying to troubleshoot a bit...
Hugh
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:05 AM Martin Holmes
mailto:mholmes@uvic.ca> wrote: Hi Peter,
Thanks for testing. I've just been hacking away with alternative places to put the xml:lang attribute, and finally hit on a setup that makes the PDF.
But the build still fails. :-( I can't see why -- I get a "working" PDF. (By which I mean it's complete with all pages, although as has been the case for years, stuff is broken all over the place.)
I can't figure out why the xelatex build is returning an error when it finishes OK. There are myriad warnings throughout the tex log, but they're all normal as far as I can see. What's happening, do you think?
The PDF output is messed up in all sorts of ways, and I can't believe anyone is using it seriously; could we consider dropping it in favour of paying more attention to the ePubs?
Cheers, Martin
On 2021-02-08 7:52 a.m., Peter Stadler wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I was just having a look but it seems you were quicker :) > Only thing left for me is to confirm that it now (with your latest commit 5ea4d84) builds for me locally, too. > > Best > Peter > >> Am 08.02.2021 um 02:53 schrieb Martin Holmes
mailto:mholmes@uvic.ca>: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The ruby stuff is now merged into the repo, and I've spent a good few hours now trying to get the PDF to build properly. It dies with this error: >> >> ! LaTeX3 Error: The key 'fontspec-opentype/...' is unknown and is being >> (LaTeX3) ignored. >> >> which is something to do with xml:lang='ja' appearing in the source. At one point I got it to build, but without the Japanese language attributes, the characters just come out as square boxes. Can anyone who knows more about LaTeX than me suggest anything? I don't really want to go round removing xml:lang attributes just to get past the PDF problem, but I don't know what else to do at this point. >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> -- >> ------------------------------------- >> Humanities Computing and Media Centre >> University of Victoria >> mholmes@uvic.ca mailto:mholmes@uvic.ca >> _______________________________________________ >> Tei-council mailing list >> Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org >> http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council > -- ------------------------------------- Humanities Computing and Media Centre University of Victoria mholmes@uvic.ca mailto:mholmes@uvic.ca _______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org mailto:Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council
-- ------------------------------------------ Martin Holmes UVic Humanities Computing and Media Centre _______________________________________________ Tei-council mailing list Tei-council@lists.tei-c.org http://lists.lists.tei-c.org/mailman/listinfo/tei-council